Review Essay: "Open Access" and its Social Context: New Colonialism in the Making?

Jaan Valsiner


I claim that what is called "open access" is actually a transformed form of traditional ("closed") access, and is "open" only by its obviously appealing label. As a re-organizational move of institutionalized kind, it benefits the economically powerful—usually "first world" based—research groups and corporations, and leads to new economic limits for the publication of innovative research emanating from less affluent researchers and laboratories. By shifting the costs of scientific publication from the recipients (journal subscribers) to the authors of published articles, "open access" creates a social scenario of one-sided information flow rather than a new form of "openness" in scholarly communication. By monopolizing the sources of scientific communication the "open access" initiative defeats its stated purpose. The articles in the reviewed Special Issue of Historische Sozialforschung have productively outlined a whole range of specific issues related to this rapidly developing social movement in scientific communication, but have failed to analyze the wider sociological nature of the ongoing negotiations of the control over scientific communication channels of which the "open access" movement is a part.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602230


open access; closing of access; social capital; peer review; journal evaluation; history of journals; knowledge; scientific communication

Full Text:



Copyright (c) 2006 Jaan Valsiner

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.