Indexing metadata

Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Mike Savage; University of Manchester; United Kingdom
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) qualitative data; secondary analysis; classic studies; social class; re-analysis
 
4. Description Abstract

This paper explores methodological issues regarding the revisiting of "classic" qualitative studies. Classic studies pose particular issues for secondary analysis. By virtue of being "classic", the findings and arguments of such studies define a subsequent "canon" of theoretical and methodological scholarship, and hence shape the thinking of subsequent researchers conducting secondary analysis. Secondary re-analysis therefore should be not only of the archived data itself, but of the published work itself, but this raises a host of complex methodological and ethical issues. Using my own reanalysis of Elizabeth BOTT's "Family and Social Network' archive, and John GOLDTHORPE and David LOCKWOOD's "Affluent Worker collection", I examine possible analytical strategies for re-analysis, including "debunking", the alternative of "sacralisation", and ways in which original data can be read "against the grain".

URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501312

 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2005-01-31
 
8. Type Status & genre Thematic Issue
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format HTML, PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/502
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.502
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research; Vol 6, No 1 (2005): Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2005 Mike Savage
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.