More Than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts

Authors

  • Katie MacMillan Loughborough University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.28

Keywords:

computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, CAQDAS, discourse analysis, qualitative research methods, media analysis

Abstract

Computer assisted qualitative data ana­lysis software (CAQDAS) is frequently described as a tool that can be used for "qualitative research" in general, with qualitative analysis treated as a "catch-all" homogeneous category. Few studies have detailed its use within specific methods, and even fewer have appraised its value for discourse analysis (DA). While some briefly comment that CAQDAS has technical limitations for discourse analysis, in general, the topic as a whole is given scant attention. Our aim is to investigate whether this limited interest in CAQDAS as a qualitative tool amongst discourse analysts, and in DA as a research method amongst CAQDAS users, is prac­tically based; due to an uncertainty about research methods, including DA; or because of method­ol­ogical incompatibilities. In order to address these questions, this study is based not only on a review of the literature on CAQDAS and on DA, but also on our own experience as discourse analysts put­ting some of the main CAQDAS to the test in a media analysis of news texts. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503257

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Katie MacMillan, Loughborough University

Katie MACMILLAN is a Research Associate in the Department of Social Sciences at Loughborough University, currently examining methods of analyzing media content. Her long term research interest is in knowledge construction—particularly in terms of reflexivity and research; therapy and therapy talk; and media constructions of news events.

Downloads

Published

2005-09-30

How to Cite

MacMillan, K. (2005). More Than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.28