@article{Roth_2004, title={Review Essay: Autobiography as Scientific Text: A Dialectical Approach to the Role of Experience}, volume={5}, url={https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/635}, DOI={10.17169/fqs-5.1.635}, abstractNote={The Sneaky Kid and Its Aftermath is a first-person account of the (sexual) intimacy between a researcher (Harry WOLCOTT) and his research participant (Brad, the sneaky kid). Two years after the events, the sneaky kid returned with a vengeance, beating up the researcher and burning down his house. Autobiographical texts may lead readers to confuse author and literary figure of the same name. Any critique of the protagonist potentially can be read as a critique of the author and therefore as an ad hominem attack—to mark the difference I propose to differentiate the two for the purpose of deconstruction (here, Harry WOLCOTT and Wally Haircut, respectively). In my reading, the relationship between Wally Haircut and Brad is highly unsymmetrical in terms of FOUCAULT’s knowledge/power concept and BOURDIEU’s analyses of the relations between economic, social, cultural, and symbolic capital. Wally Haircut, I will argue in part, had everything to gain in these dimensions and his research participant, the "sneaky kid," had everything to lose. This is just how it turned out. Unfortunately, Harry WOLCOTT failed to draw on existing social theory to provide a reasonable explanation of the events. I conclude with a "two thumbs down. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040199}, number={1}, journal={Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research}, author={Roth, Wolff-Michael}, year={2004}, month={Jan.} }