TY - JOUR AU - Mottier, VĂ©ronique PY - 2005/05/31 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - The Interpretive Turn: History, Memory, and Storage in Qualitative Research JF - Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research JA - FQS VL - 6 IS - 2 SE - Part 1: The Why and How of Qualitative Methods DO - 10.17169/fqs-6.2.456 UR - https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/456 SP - AB - This article reviews the field of qualitative inquiry, identifying three conceptual breaks: the "orthodox consensus" of positivism which conceives the social world as a collection of external facts and attempts to eliminate bias and subjectivity; post-positivist philosophy of science, which concedes that objective observation of pure data is impossible but nevertheless tries to establish criteria of "good" research practice; and the interpretive turn, which rehabilitates subjectivity and views data collection as a mutual construction of meaning where the researcher is engaged in "double hermeneutics" (GIDDENS). The interpretive turn has implications for history, memory, and storage of data. However, while recognizing the interactionist and contextual nature of data collection, the article points out that it is counterproductive to overemphasize its implications, as some postmodern strands of interpretive research do. Drawing on the hermeneutic notions of objectivation and the hermeneutic circle, it is argued that interpretive research data consist of objectivations, and therefore lend themselves to storage and future revision, newly emerging questions, and (re-)interpretation. Furthermore, data storage allows for data access by non-specialists, including the subjects of the research. Archiving consequently potentially contributes to empowerment, feedback and dialogue.URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502330 ER -