Noncompliance: A Never-Ending Story. Understanding the Perspective of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Maren Stamer, Norbert Schmacke, Petra Richter


For roughly the last 25 years there has been consensus in social science research that the term "compliance" in medical therapy research lacks clarity and may even be counter-productive. However, the medical world continues to be disconcerted and scandalized when patients take a critical attitude to doctors' instructions or indeed fail to comply with them. In order to explore this area, interviews were conducted with patients who have suffered for at least eight to ten years from rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic disease that often leads to disability and a decline in social status. The sample was created in cooperation with the German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ) at the Charité Berlin Hospital. The survey methodology comprised partially structured interviews with an initial narrative exploration. The interviews were analyzed both in terms of their content as well as with the use of elements of the framework concept of "grounded theory methodology." Our qualitative study has shown that patients take great efforts to manage their disease and that the important thing here is to provide professional support rather than to criticize patients' individual beliefs, preferences and decisions for or against therapeutic recommendations.



(non) compliance; rheumatoid arthritis; patient perspectives; content analysis; grounded theory methodology

Full Text:


Copyright (c) 2013 Maren Stamer, Norbert Schmacke, Petra Richter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.