Challenging the Dualistic Assumptions of Academic Writing: Representing Ph.D. Research As Embodied Practice

Mary Hanrahan


This article will address the tensions between dualistic traditions of our culture (cf. WERTHEIM, 1999) and new ways of understanding how people come to know what they know through embodied practice within biological and social ecosystems (e.g., DAMASIO, 1994; LEAR, 1998; LEMKE, 1995; MATURANA & VARELA, 1992). It will also raise implications of a biosocial system model for research methodology and academic writing. In my Ph.D. thesis in education I demonstrated that a significant role was played in the construction of my knowledge by my body[-mind], much of it initially outside my awareness. However, I found that theses were still expected to support the myth that learning which will advance knowledge about education is almost exclusively the product of abstract and systematic logical processes, of a disembodied spirit.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0302301


epistemology; dualism; research methodology; emotions; embodied mind; thesis writing; poststructuralism; tacit knowledge; biosocial system; education

Full Text:



Copyright (c) 2003 Mary Hanrahan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.