Review Essay: Reporting Large-Scale Qualitative Research: The Ergography
Keywords: reporting, large-scale, research programs, ergography, science and technology studies
AbstractAs social science research programmes tend to increase in scale, reporting their results in a coherent manner is growing more difficult. Andrew WEBSTER's edited volume presents a wealth of social science research and is a pleasant read for many reasons. However, its sheer vastness can hardly be contained in an edited volume. In this article, we review the book itself whilst we also discuss what it means to report about large scale social science research programmes and propose an alternative mode for this reporting: the ergography. The ergography provides a window not so much on the results of the programme but rather on the work that is being done in the context of a research programme. The ergography allows for an active stand from the reader and aims to bring the reader as closely as possible to the laboratory, doctor's office or hospital that has been part of the research. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901182
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Penders, B., & Nelis, A. (2008). Review Essay: Reporting Large-Scale Qualitative Research: The Ergography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.1.1005
Copyright (c) 2008 Bart Penders, Annemiek Nelis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.