Editorial Note: Reevaluating Book Reviews: As Scientific Contributions

  • Günter Mey University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal
Keywords: review, review essay, dialogue, scientific exchange, perspectivity, online publishing

Abstract

In the first part of this text, I would like to describe some advantages book reviews offer. The book reviews—providing the fact that they succeed in offering more than just a short content description to the reader—can also contribute to scientific discourses in a similar way regular contributions do. One of the reasons why book reviews currently often do not fulfil this possible function is due to the existing restrictions within traditional print media publishing. Additionally worth mentioning are actual standards within the scientific community which tend to underestimate the value of book reviews or review essays. In the second part, I will discuss some developmental potentials in book reviews which up to now were hardly recognized: Especially with the Internet and its characteristics-nearly unlimited space resources; flexible publishing time and design of the contributions; chance for a direct exchange between researchers, for example using discussion boards—a re-evaluation of book reviews and review essays seems to be possible and reasonable. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003400

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2000-12-31
How to Cite
Mey, G. (2000). Editorial Note: Reevaluating Book Reviews: As Scientific Contributions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.3.1057

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>