A Historical and Comparative Note on the Relationship Between Analytic Induction and Grounded Theorising
Keywords:analytic induction, grounded theorising, Lindesmith, Strauss, Blumer
AbstractAnalytic induction (AI) and grounded theorising (GT) have long been influential models for conceptualising and guiding particular kinds of qualitative research. However, the relationship between them, in terms of both historical development and conceptual structure, is not always clearly understood. As I show in this article, there are obstacles to understanding these matters. Alfred LINDESMITH, one of the major architects and champions of AI, and Anselm STRAUSS, co-inventor of GT, were students of Herbert BLUMER at the same time, and collaborated on various projects. However, only STRAUSS, with Barney GLASER, provided a detailed comparison between the two approaches. Moreover, even this leaves us with some uncertainties about the precise nature of the similarities and differences, and the reasons for these. The relationship of AI and GT to BLUMER's methodological thinking is even more obscure. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100243
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Hammersley, M. (2010). A Historical and Comparative Note on the Relationship Between Analytic Induction and Grounded Theorising. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1400
Copyright (c) 2010 Martyn Hammersley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.