Reflecting on the Tensions Between Emic and Etic Perspectives in Life History Research: Lessons Learned

James L. Olive

doi:10.17169/fqs-15.2.2072

James L. Olive Ashland University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.2.2072

Keywords: bisexual, etic, emic, gay, lesbian, life history

Abstract

I utilized a life history methodology in this study through which written and oral narratives were obtained from six postsecondary students who self-identified as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and/or Queer (LGBQ). Through this narrative process, I endeavored to understand how past events and behaviors shaped the participants' identities and their sense of resiliency. During the data analysis process, I experienced tension between etic and emic categories and themes. Consequently, I struggled to maintain an inductive position throughout the coding process. This article provides an overview of this process and seeks to add to the discussion regarding etic and emic perspectives in qualitative research.

URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs140268

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

James L. Olive, Ashland University

Dr. James L. OLIVE is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Leadership Studies at Ashland University. Dr. OLIVE received his Ph.D. from The University of Dayton where he completed a qualitative investigation into the familial and collegiate backgrounds and cultures of persistent LGBTQ college students. His research areas of interest include the support of marginalized student groups, as well as the intellectual and identity development of postsecondary students.