Don't Blame the Software: Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software Successfully in Doctoral Research

Authors

  • Michelle Salmona Institute for Mixed Methods Research
  • Dan Kaczynski Central Michigan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2505

Keywords:

doctoral education, qualitative methodology, dissertation research, qualitative data analysis software, QDAS, technology acceptance model, TAM, action research

Abstract

In this article, we explore the learning experiences of doctoral candidates as they use qualitative data analysis software (QDAS). Of particular interest is the process of adopting technology during the development of research methodology. Using an action research approach, data was gathered over five years from advanced doctoral research candidates and supervisors. The technology acceptance model (TAM) was then applied as a theoretical analytic lens for better understanding how students interact with new technology.

Findings relate to two significant barriers which doctoral students confront: 1. aligning perceptions of ease of use and usefulness is essential in overcoming resistance to technological change; 2. transparency into the research process through technology promotes insights into methodological challenges. Transitioning through both barriers requires a competent foundation in qualitative research. The study acknowledges the importance of higher degree research, curriculum reform and doctoral supervision in post-graduate research training together with their interconnected relationships in support of high-quality inquiry.

URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1603117

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Michelle Salmona, Institute for Mixed Methods Research

Michelle SALMONA is President of the Institute for Mixed Methods Research (IMMR) and an adjunct associate professor at the University of Canberra. With a background as a project management professional and a senior fellow of the Higher Education Academy, UK, she is a specialist in research design and methods. Michelle is a co-founder of IMMR, building global collaborations for grant development, and customized training and consultancy services for individuals and groups engaged in mixed-methods and qualitative analysis. Michelle works as an international consultant in: program evaluation; research design; and mixed-methods and qualitative data analysis using software. Her research focus is to better understand how to support doctoral success and strengthen the research process; and build data-driven decision making capacity in the corporate world. Michelle's particular interests relate to the relationship between technology and doctoral success. Recent research includes exploring the changing practices of qualitative research during the dissertation phase of doctoral studies, and investigates how we bring learning into the use of technology during the research process. Michelle is currently working on different projects with researchers from education, information systems, business communication, leadership, and finance.

Dan Kaczynski, Central Michigan University

Dan KACZYNSKI is a professor of educational leadership at Central Michigan University and an adjunct professor at the University of Canberra, Australia. Dan is a senior research fellow at the Institute for Mixed Methods Research. His publications and presentations promote technological innovations in qualitative data analysis, professional development for doctoral supervision, and is actively engaged in applied research and program evaluation.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-28

How to Cite

Salmona, M., & Kaczynski, D. (2016). Don’t Blame the Software: Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software Successfully in Doctoral Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2505

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2016)

Section

Single Contributions

License

Todos los artículos en FQS están protegidos por la Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y retienen derechos de publicación sin restricciones.

Ya que se ha presentado una contribución y después del proceso de revisión de pares exitoso, los editores FQS tienen el derecho a publicarla. 

Las contribuciones enviados deben ser originales. Deben no haber sido publicadas o enviadas simultáneamente para publicación a otro sitio en forma similar o con el mismo contenido en general. Reimpresos de contribuciones ya publicadas en otro sitio son aceptadas si (a) atrae los intereses de los lectores FQS y no ha alcanzado ya una audiencia amplia, y si (b) se asegura que el poseedor de los derechos reservados permite la reimpresión (en caso de que la persona que envíe no sea el poseedor del derecho). Si esas condiciones son satisfechas, FQS puede aceptar reimpresos, los cuales serán publicados con la referencia al lugar de la primera publicación.

FQS tiene el derecho de publicar cualquier contribución, e.g. en CD-ROM o para ediciones impresas seleccionadas en cualquier momento en el futuro. En ese caso, los autores respectivos serán informados. 

Para más preguntas, siéntase libre de contactarnos por medio del correo electrónico.