Research in the Context of Vulnerability and Extreme Suffering—Ethical Issues of Social Science Disaster Research

Cordula Dittmer, Daniel F. Lorenz


In this article we discuss ethical questions of social science disaster research. We assume that disaster research has to confront ethical issues in a special way, since its main field of research is often extreme suffering and vulnerability. Because such studies should also contribute to alleviate this suffering and the vulnerability of the people affected, they have to be more of an applied and less of a theoretical nature. Based on the figural depiction of the heterogeneity of the field, ethical questions of social science disaster research are presented and contrasted with standardized ethical research principles, institutional review boards and guidelines in the US and Germany. In this contribution, we discuss the dual imperative with the informed consent as well as the principle do-no-harm and we critically identify underlying aporias. Based on Judith BUTLER's reflections on ethical violence and fundamental sociological reflections on the structure of societies, we propose taking a critical look at standardizations and call for a reciprocal ethic of vulnerability that can provide a foundation for research on disasters beyond all standardization.


disaster research; research ethics; informed consent; dual imperative; do-no-harm, vulnerability


Copyright (c) 2018 Cordula Dittmer, Daniel F. Lorenz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.