Situational Analysis and Digital Methods

Authors

  • Carrie Friese London School of Economic and Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.2.4078

Keywords:

digital methods, funeral, grief, situational analysis, situational analytics, autoethnography

Abstract

In this paper, I reflect upon the methodological implications of digitization and digital methods for situational analysis. I carefully read Noortje MARRES's argument for and development of what she called situational analytics. I ask how her proposal would be incorporated within a situational analysis project of digitization and funerals. I develop a provisional research design, as a kind of thought experiment, weaving my reflections on situational analysis and digital methods through an autoethnographic account of mourning in the enforced digital of the COVID-19 pandemic. I conclude with the argument that such digital methods are necessary for situational analysis to reckon with, and yet also pose a risk of erasing the embodied and affective elements of a situation. I contend that the poiesis of ethnographic research—where mediated and embodied interactions qua situations are experienced and written into language, and writing forms a necessary but always also impossible task—remains rooted in bodies and affects that are always also elements in situational analysis. We cannot lose track of those elements that also defy the digitized elements of any given situation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carrie Friese, London School of Economic and Political Science

Carrie FRIESE is associate professor in the Sociology Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science. She teaches and researches in the fields of medical sociology, science and technology studies, and animal studies using situational analysis and other relational research methods.

References

Arnold, Michael; Gibbs, Martin; Koh, Tamara; Meese, James & Nansen, Bjorn (2017). Death and digital media. London: Routledge.

Bowker, Geoffrey C. & Star, Susan Leigh (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Clark, Timothy (1993). By heart: A reading of Derrida's "Che cos'è la poesia?" through Keats and Celan. Oxford Literary Review, 15(1/2), 43-78.

Clarke, Adele E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Clarke, Adele E. & Keller, Reiner (2014). Engaging complexeties: Working against simplification as an agenda for qualitative research today. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(2), Art. 1, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.2.2186 [Accessed: March 28, 2023].

Clarke, Adele E.; Friese, Carrie & Washburn, Rachel S. (2018). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ellis, Carolyn; Adams, Tony E. & Bochner, Arthur P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589 [Accessed: April 18, 2023].

Friese, Carrie (2019). Intimate entanglements in the animal house: Caring for and about mice. The Sociological Review, 67(2), 287-298.

Friese, Carrie; Clarke, Adele E. & Washburn, Rachel S. (2021). Situational analysis as critical pragmatist interactionism. In Dirk vom Lehn, Natalia Ruiz-Juno & Will Gibson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of interactionism (pp.357-368). London: Routledge.

Kennedy, Brianna & Moore, Hadass (2021). Grounded duoethnography: A dialogic method for the exploration of intuition through divergence and convergence. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 22(2), Art. 17, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.2.3668 [Accessed: March 28, 2023].

Knorr-Cetina, Karin (2009). The synthetic situation: Interactionism for a global world. Symbolic Interaction, 32(1), 61-87.

Marres, Noortje (2020). For a situational analytics: An interpretative methodology for the study of situations in computational settings. Big Data & Society, (7)2, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720949571 [Accessed: March 28, 2023].

Massumi, Brian (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.

Mruck, Katja & Mey, Günter (2019). Grounded theory and reflexivity. In Anthony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp.470-496). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Mruck, Katja; Roth, Wolff-Michael & Breuer, Franz (Eds.) (2002). Subjectivity and reflexivity in qualitative research I. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/21 [Accessed: April 18, 2023].

Puwar, Nirmal (2021). Carrying as method: Listening to bodies as archives. Body & Society, 27(1), 3-26.

Roth, Wolff-Michael; Breuer, Franz & Mruck, Katja (Eds.) (2003). Subjectivity and reflexivity in qualitative research II. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/18 [Accessed: April 18, 2023].

Downloads

Published

2023-05-30

How to Cite

Friese, C. (2023). Situational Analysis and Digital Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.2.4078

Issue

Section

Social Worlds, Arenas, and Situational Analyses: Theoretical Debates and Practical Research Experiences