Doing Sociology With People: Disability, Coloniality and Reflexivity in Institutional Ethnography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.2.4308Keywords:
reflexivity, institutional ethnography, disability, coloniality, academic homecomers, listening guide, sociological interventionAbstract
In this paper, I offer an embedded approach to reflexivity in institutional ethnography (IE). I draw on a study conducted with disabled students in a post-colonial higher education context to show why and how existing approaches to reflexivity in IE have been inadequate in preserving the voice of subaltern subjects. I engage with the question of what reflexivity means for "academic homecomer[s]" (ORIOLA & HAGGERTY, 2012) who have been educated in the global North, going to research in the South. By proposing a decolonial IE that demands biographical, epistemic, analytical and transformational reflexivity, I advance the arguments for IE to move from a "sociology for people" (SMITH, 2005) to a sociology with people who are being ruled by the "colonial matrix of power" relations (MIGNOLO & WALSH, 2018, p.4). With a decolonial IE, I take a reflexive approach to understanding how the trans-local conditions of coloniality coordinate the social relations of inclusion and participation for disabled students. I conclude that while IE allows the opportunity to empower those being ruled by a matrix of domination with the knowledge of how things are organised, like some other participatory research, it does not offer researchers a way to work with the people on how to transform their everyday actualities.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Ajuji (1989). The asquith tradition, the ashby reform, and the development of higher education in Nigeria. Minerva, 27, 1-20.
Ahmed, Sara (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, Sara (2019). What’s the use?: On the uses of use. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Balan, B. Nicole (2005). Multiple voices and methods: Listening to women who are in workplace transition. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(4), 63-86, https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ijqm/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4433 [Accessed: November 11, 2024].
Bendix, Daniel (2018). Global development and colonial power: German development policy at home and abroad. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Benhabib, Seyla (1995). Feminism and postmodernism: An uneasy alliance. In Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell & Nancy Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp.17-34). New York, NY: Routledge.
Boal, Augusto (2000 [1974]). Theatre of the oppressed (transl. by C.A. McBride). London: Pluto Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre & Wacquant, Loic J.D. (1992 [1988]). An invitation to reflexive sociology (transl. by L.J.D. Wacquant). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Borda, Orlando Fals (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it: The Colombian experience. Dialectical Anthropology, 4, 33-55.
Breuer, Franz; Mruck, Katja & Roth, Wolff-Michael (2002). Subjectivity and reflexivity: An introduction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 9, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.822 [Accessed: February 15, 2025].
Burawoy, Michael (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4-33.
Butler, Judith (1995). Contingent foundations. In Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell & Nancy Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp.35-57). New York, NY: Routledge.
Campbell, Marie (1998). Institutional ethnography and experience as data. Qualitative Sociology, 21(1), 55-73.
Campbell, Marie & Gregor, Frances (2002). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
DeVault, Marjorie L. & McCoy, Liza (2006). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In Dorothy E. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice (pp.15-44). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Deveau, J. Louis (2008). Examining the institutional ethnographer’s toolkit. Socialist Studies / Études Socialistes, 4(2), 1-19, https://doi.org/10.18740/S4F60Z [Accessed: February 18, 2025].
Deveau, J. Louis (2014). Using institutional ethnography’s ideological circle to portray how textually mediated disability discourse paralysed a Supreme Court of Canada ruling. Culture and Organization, 22(4), 311-329.
Doucet, Andrea (2018a). Revisiting and remaking the listening guide: An ecological and ontological narrativity approach to analyzing fathering narratives. In Áine M. Humble & M. Elise Radina (Eds.), How qualitative data analysis happens: Moving beyond "themes emerged" (pp.80-94). New York, NY: Routledge.
Doucet, Andrea (2018b). Do men mother?. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Doucet, Andrea & Mauthner, Natasha. S. (2008). What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the listening guide. Qualitative Research, 8(3), 399-409.
Finlay, Linda (2002). "Outing" the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Researcher, 12(4), 531-545.
Finlay, Linda (2005). "Reflexive embodied empathy": A phenomenology of participant-researcher intersubjectivity. The Humanistic Psychologist, 33(4), 271-292.
Freire, Paulo (2000 [1970]). Pedagogy of the oppressed (transl. by M.B. Ramos). New York, NY: Continuum.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Geertz, Clifford (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Geertz, Clifford (1996). After the fact: Two countries, four decades, one anthropologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, Carol (2015). The listening guide method of psychological inquiry [Editorial]. Qualitative Psychology, 2(1), 69-77.
Gilligan, Carol & Eddy, Jessica (2017). Listening as a path to psychological discovery: An introduction to the listening guide. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(2), 76-81, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0335-3 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Gilligan, Carol; Spencer, Renée; Weinberg, Martha K. & Bertsch, Tatiana (2003). On the listening guide: A voice-centered relational method. In Paul M. Camic, Jean E. Rhodes & Lucy Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp.157-172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Giwa, Aisha (2015), Insider/outsider isues for development researchers from the Global South. Geography Compass, 9(6), 316-326.
Griffith, Alison & Smith, Dorothy E. (2004). Mothering for schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
Griffith, Alison & Smith, Dorothy E. (2014). Introduction. In Alison Griffith & Dorothy E. Smith (Eds.), Under new public management: Institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work (pp 3-21). Toronto: University of Toronto Press
Grosfoguel, Ramón (2011). Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political-economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004 [Accessed: February 19, 2025].
Harel-Shalev, Ayelet & Daphna-Tekoah, Shayna (2021). Breaking the binaries in research—the listening guide. Qualitative Psychology, 8(2), 211-223.
Hertz, Rosanna (1997). Introduction: Reflexivity and voice. In Rosanna Hertz (Eds.), Reflexivity & voice (pp.vii-xviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hollway, Wendy, & Jefferson, Tony (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
Hutton, Margaret & Lystor, Clare (2020). The listening guide: Voice-centred-relational analysis of private subjectivities. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 24(1), 14-31.
Isiaka, Abass B. (2024). "This space is not built for people like us": An institutional ethnography of the everyday work of students with disabilities in Nigerian universities. Doctoral dissertation, education, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/95849 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Kemmis, Stephen (1995). Emancipatory aspirations in a postmodern era. Curriculum Studies, 3(2), 133-167, https://doi.org/10.1080/0965975950030203 [Accessed: February 11, 2025].
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970 [1962]). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Maton, Karl (2003). Reflexivity, relationism, & research: Pierre Bourdieu and the epistemic conditions of social scientific knowledge. Space and Culture, 6(1), 52-65.
Mayorga-Gallo, Sarah & Hordge-Freeman, Elizabeth (2017). Between marginality and privilege: Gaining access and navigating the field in multiethnic settings. Qualitative Research, 17(4), 377-394, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116672915 [Accessed: February 20, 2025].
Mauthner, S. Natasha (1999). "Feeling low and feeling really bad about feeling low": Women’s experiences of motherhood and postpartum depression. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 40(2), 143-161.
Mignolo, Walter D. (2002). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57-96.
Mignolo, Walter D. & Walsh, Catherine E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Murray, Órla Meadhbh (2019). Doing feminist text-focused institutional ethnography in UK universities. Doctoral dissertation, Sociology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/35719/Murray2019.pdf [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Nencel, Lorraine (2014). Situating reflexivity: Voices, positionalities, and representations in feminist ethnographic texts. Women’s Studies International Forum, 43(Special Issue), 75-83.
Ng, Stella; Stooke, Rosamund; Regan, Sandra; Hibbert, Kathryn; Schryer, Catherine; Phelan, Sheila & Lingard, Lorelei (2013). An institutional ethnography inquiry of health care work in special education: A research protocol. International Journal of Integrated Care, 13(33), https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1052 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Oriola, Temitope & Haggerty, Kevin D. (2012). The ambivalent insider/outsider status of academic "homecomers": Observations on identity and field research in the Nigerian Delta. Sociology, 46(3), 540-548.
Patai, Daphne (1994). (Response) When method becomes power. In Andrew Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method (pp.61-73). New York, NY: Routledge.
Petrovic, Sanja; Lordly, Daphne; Brigham, Susan & Delaney, Mary (2015). Learning to listen: An analysis of applying the listening guide to reflection papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621402 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Reid, Jackie & Russell, Louise (2018). Perspectives on and from institutional ethnography. Bingley: Emerald.
Riley, Sarah; Schouten, Wendy & Cahill, Sharon (2003). Exploring the dynamics of subjectivity and power between researcher and researched. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), Art. 40, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.713 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Scott, Joan W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17(4), 773-797.
Smith, Dorothy E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, Dorothy E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, Dorothy E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, Dorothy E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.
Smith, Dorothy E. (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Smith, George W. (1990). Political activist as ethnographer. Social Problems, 37(4), 629-648.
Smith, Linda T. (2013). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
Sorsoli, Linda & Tolman, Deborah L. (2008). Hearing voices: Listening for multiplicity and movement. In Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber & Patricia Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp.495-515). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Springmann, Marie-Luise; Daphna-Tekoah, Shir; Harel, Ayelet; Hendrich, Béatrice & Kiegelmann, Mechthild (2025). Not lost in translation: Multi-perspective collaborative analysis with the listening guide, illustrated by a case of a woman in combat. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(1), Art 11, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4222 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Tomlinson, Sally (2017). A sociology of special and inclusive education: Exploring the manufacture of inability. London: Taylor & Francis.
Touraine, Alain (1981 [1978]). The voice and the eye: An analysis of social movements (transl. by A. Duff). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vangkilde, Kasper T. & Sausdal, David B. (2016). Overponderabilia: Overcoming overthinking when studying "ourselves". Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 28, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2497 [Accessed: November 8, 2024].
Vaughan, Suzanne & Luken, Paul C. (2023). Introduction: Where do we go from here?. In Suzanne Vaughan & Paul C. Luken (Eds.), Critical commentary on institutional ethnography (pp.1-7). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Walby, Kevin (2007). On the social relations of research: A critical assessment of institutional ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(7), 1008-1030.
Walby, Kevin (2013). Institutional ethnography and data analysis: Making sense of data dialogues. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 141-154.
Wolcott, Harry F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.
Woodcock, Christine (2016). The listening guide: A how-to approach on ways to promote educational democracy. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916677594 [Accessed: February 17, 2025].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abass Isiaka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
