Qualitative Research in Sport Sciences: Is the Biomedical Ethics Model Applicable?


  • Steve Olivier Northumbria University
  • Lesley Fishwick Northumbria University




ethics, quantitative research, qualitative research, ethics committees


Research in sports science has historically been grounded in positivist traditions. This means that ethics committees may not be adequately sensitized to the ethical problems posed by qualitative research. Qualitative researchers may thus be disadvantaged in the research approval process. Our paper argues that the traditional biomedical ethics model may not always be appropriate in evaluating qualitative proposals. Due to the nature of its methods, qualitative work may have emergent and ongoing ethical issues that require consultation and resolution. We argue that, contrary to the judgements of many ethics committees, methods such as deception and covert observation can be justified if certain conditions are met. In reaffirming a commitment to the overarching ethical principle of respect for persons, we conclude that researchers need to recognize and plan for ethical issues in their work. Likewise, ethics committees need to recognize that qualitative work poses unique problems, but that these need not necessarily be insurmountable obstacles to project approval. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0301121


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Steve Olivier, Northumbria University

Dr Steve C. OLIVIER, research interests: research ethics, human performance

Lesley Fishwick, Northumbria University

Dr Lesley FISHWICK, research interests: identity, culture, sports ethnography




How to Cite

Olivier, S., & Fishwick, L. (2003). Qualitative Research in Sport Sciences: Is the Biomedical Ethics Model Applicable?. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.1.754