Ethical and Friendly Researchers, but not Insiders: A Response to Blodgett, Boyer, and Turk

Michelle K. McGinn


This commentary is a response to the article by Lisa J. BLODGETT, Wanda BOYER, and Emily TURK (2005) in this issue of FQS. The original article describes ethical challenges and relational issues within a large, ongoing, qualitative study about the development of self-regulation in early childhood. Those authors focus in particular upon: (a) obtaining free and informed consent, (b) working with vulnerable populations, and (c) bal­ancing insider and outsider roles. I identify some key strengths of the research that may provide use­ful models for other researchers, while cautioning against the evident overgeneralization of the term "insider." BLODGETT et al. clearly demonstrate that they are ethical and friendly researchers, but they are not insiders in the daycare settings where their research takes place. I conclude with a call for researchers to seriously consider and empirically document what it might mean to adopt a subject-centered perspective on research ethics.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503375


research ethics; researcher-partici­pant relationships; insider-outsider roles; subject-centered perspective

Full Text:



Copyright (c) 2005 Michelle K. McGinn

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.