"Naturalist Inquiry" and Grounded Theory

Barney G. Glaser


The world of Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) methodology became quite taken with LINCOLN and GUBA's book "Naturalist Inquiry" (1985). I have no issue with it with respect to its application to QDA; it helped clarify and advance so many QDA issues. However, its application to Grounded Theory (GT) has been a major block on GT, as originated, by its cooptation and corruption hence remodeling of GT by default. LINCOLN and GUBA have simply assumed GT is just another QDA method, which it is not. In "The Grounded Theory Perspective II" (GLASER 2002a, Chapter 9 on credibility), I have discussed "Naturalist In­quiry" (NI) thought regarding how LINCOLN and GUBA's notion of "trustworthy" data (or worrisome data orientation) and how their view of constant comparison can and has remodeled and eroded GT. In this paper I will consider other aspects of NI that remodel GT.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040170


qualitative data analysis; naturalist inquiry; grounded theory

Full Text:


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-5.1.652

Copyright (c) 2004 Barney G. Glaser

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.