Making a Scientist: Discursive "Doing" of Identity and Self-Presentation During Research Interviews

Yew-Jin Lee, Wolff-Michael Roth


Participating in an interview is taking part in an activity system that is often very different from the daily lives of most individuals. Grounding ourselves in an activity theoretic perspective, we regard the interview event and who or what these agents become during that process as an out­come of the activity of "doing interviews." In con­trast to the modern concept of identity, a stable and characteristic feature of an individual, we under­stand identity as arising from social interactions—identity and activity are said to be in a dialectical relationship. Interviews are thus occasions where­by identity and issues of self-presentation have to be managed by agents primarily through discourse processes. By further regarding interviews as "topic" in this article we make salient their co-con­struc­tive nature qua social interaction rather than as a neutral data gathering tool. Our case study of an interview with a renowned environmental scien­tist demonstrates how identity and issues of self-presentation were discursively played out using the concepts of "stake" and "footing." It was found that our participant came to be a full-fledged mem­ber of the scientific community with traits typically ascribed to scientists such as expertise, objec­tivity, passion and disinterestedness. This discurs­ive "doing" of identity and self-presentation during research interviews is a pervasive effect and cautions practitioners against treating interviews as an unproblematic methodology. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0401123


identity; self-presentation; activity theory; interviews; stake; footing

Full Text:


Copyright (c) 2004 Yew-Jin Lee, Wolff-Michael Roth

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.