Competence and Praxis: Sequential Analysis in German Sociology
Keywords:
sequential analysis, case, conversation analysis, objective hermeneutic, hermeneutic sociology of knowledge
Abstract
In German social research nowadays most qualitative methodologies employ sequential analysis. This article explores the similarities and differences in conceptualising and practising this method. First, the working consensus, conceived as a shared set of methodological assumptions, is explicated. Second, with regard to three major paradigms of qualitative research in Germany—conversation analysis, objective hermeneutics, and hermeneutic sociology of knowledge—the different ways of doing sequential analysis are investigated to locate the points of departure from a working consensus. It is argued that differences arise from different case-perspectives and, relative to that, from different modes of introducing general knowledge, i.e. knowledge that is not specific for the analysed case, into the interpretation. An important notion to emerge from the comparison is the distinction between competence and praxis. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503310Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2005-09-30
How to Cite
Maiwald, K.-O. (2005). Competence and Praxis: Sequential Analysis in German Sociology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.21
Section
Innovations in Special Methods
Copyright (c) 2005 Kai-Olaf Maiwald

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.