Patterns of Surprise and Ambivalence: Studying Social Media Visuality by Way of Aggregated Autoethnography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.2.4182Keywords:
autoethnography, aggregated autoethnography, social media, visualityAbstract
Visuality is central in social media experiences, but complex to research. In this paper, we introduce aggregated autoethnography for nuanced analysis of socially mediated visual practices. The approach starts from guided autoethnographies which help to empower participants to explore their own experiences and build thick descriptions, and moves through multiple levels of aggregation, integration and synthesis (from individual autoethnographies to national datasets of coded snippets, to datasets specific to arguments emerging out of multinational patterns). The aggregated autoethnography approach makes unexpected topics accessible; offers dynamic, rather than static insight; makes visible that which is routine and tacit, as well as that which is experienced as ambivalent. Further, aggregation allows synthesis of multiple perspectives, revealing patterns across contexts that are otherwise difficult to detect. The approach detailed here is used to move back and forth between the singular pieces of visual content and the flows they are part of; to remain loyal to the situational perspective that the visual communication becomes meaningful in; to capture relevant artifacts as well as people's practices; and to be mindful of the affective, embodied and material aspects of ways of seeing with social media.
Downloads
References
Adams, Tony & Holman Jones, Stacy (2008). Autoethnography is queer. In Norman Denzin, Yvonna Lincoln & Linda Tuhiwai Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp.373-390). London: Sage.
Anderson, Leon (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373-395.
Are, Carolina (2021). The shadowban cycle: An autoethnography of pole dancing, nudity, and censorship on Instagram. Feminist Media Studies, 22(8), 2002-2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1928259 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Barroso, Julie & Powell-Cope, Gail M. (2000). Metasynthesis of qualitative research on living with HIV infection. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 340-53, https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118480 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Becker, Howard S. (1970). Sociological work: Method and substance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Berger, John (1972). Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Association and Penguin.
Bergdahl, Elisabeth (2019). Is meta-synthesis turning rich descriptions into thin reductions? A criticism of meta-aggregation as a form of qualitative synthesis. Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), 1-8.
Bochner, Arthur P. & Ellis, Carolyn (1992). Personal narrative as a social approach to interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 2(2), 165-172.
Boll, Tobias (2024). Meet "me" in the field(-notes): The selves and self-relations of autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(8-9), 674-683, https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231196921 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Breckner, Roswitha & Mayer, Elisabeth (2023). Social media as a means of visual biographical performance and biographical work. Current Sociology, 71(4), 661-682, https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921221132518 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Bruner, Jerome S (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruns, Axel (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Bucher, Taina & Helmond, Anne (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In Jean Burgess, Thomas Poell & Alice E. Marwick (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media (pp.233-253). London: Sage.
Charmaz, Kathy (2014 [2006]). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Clarke, Adele E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London: Sage.
Davidjants, Jaana & Tiidenberg, Katrin (2022). Activist memory narration on social media: Armenian genocide on Instagram. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2191-2206.
Denzin, Norman K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dubois, Elizabeth & Ford, Heather (2015). Trace interviews: An actor-centered approach. International Journal of Communication, 9(25), 2067-2091, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3378/141 [Accessed: January 8, 2024].
Ellis, Carolyn; Adams, Tony E. & Bochner, Arthur P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589 [Accessed: March 14, 2025].
Emerson, Robert M.; Fretz, Rachel I. & Shaw, Linda L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Eschler, Jordan (2016). A critical reflection on social media research using an autoethnographic approach. In Tung X. Bui & Ralph H. Sprague, Jr. (Eds.), 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA (pp.1871-1880). Los Alamitos, CA: Conference Publishing Services.
Estabrooks, Carole A.; Field, Peggy Anne & Morse, Janice M. (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: an approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4), 503-511.
Geertz, Clifford (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gibbs, Martin; Meese, James; Arnold, Michael; Nansen, Bjorn & Carter, Marcus (2014). #funeral and Instagram: death, social media and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255-268.
Gomez Cruz, Edgar & Lehmuskallio, Asko (Eds.) (2016). Digital photography and everyday life: Empirical studies on material visual practices. London: Routledge.
Goodall, Harold L. (2001). Writing the new ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Greschke, Heike (2023). "Positioning" analysis with autoethnography—epistemic explorations of self-reflexivity: Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(8-9), 659-662, https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231193762 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Hand, Martin (2013). Ubiquitous photography: Digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Holman Jones, Stacy (2016). Living bodies of thought: The "critical" in critical autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(4), 228-237.
Joffe, Helene (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 55(1), 84-93.
Jorgensen, Kristian M. (2016). The media go-along: Researching mobilities with media at hand. MedieKultur, 32(60), 32-49, https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22429 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Latzko-Toth, Guillaume; Bonneau, Claudine & Millette, Mélanie (2017). Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. In Anabel Quan-Haase, & Luke Sloan. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp.199-214). London: Sage.
Leaver, Tama; Highfield, Tim & Abidin, Crystal (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Li, Yiyi & Xie, Ying (2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1),1-19.
Light, Ben; Burgess, Jean & Duguay, Stefanie (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881-900.
Mann, Peter (2016). The research interview: Reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marcus, George (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Markham, Annette N. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Markham, Annette N. (2013a). Remix cultures, remix methods: reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts. In Norman K. Denzin & Michael D. Giardina (Eds), Global dimensions of qualitative inquiry (pp.63-81). New York. NY: Routledge.
Markham, Annette N. (2013b). Fieldwork in social media: What would Malinowski do?. Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 2(4), 434-446.
Markham, Annette N. (2017). Reflexivity: Some techniques for interpretive researchers. Blogpost, https://annettemarkham.com/2017/02/reflexivity-for-interpretive-researchers/ [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Markham, Annette N. (2018). Critical pedagogy as a response to datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 754-760.
Markham, Annette N. (2022). Youth + digital Literacy + algorithmic relations: A ten year pedagogical model. Blogpost, https://annettemarkham.com/2022/11/digital-literacy-ten-year-pedagogy/ [Accessed: January 11, 2024].
Markham, Annette N. & Pronzato, Riccardo (2023). A critical (theory) data literacy. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(5/6), 293-320.
Marwick, Alice E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137-160.
Marwick, Alice E. & Boyd, Danah (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051-1067.
Mavroudis, Jonathan (2018). Fame labor. In Crystal Abidin & Megan Lindsay Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity around the globe (pp.83-93). Bingley: Emerald.
Miguel, Cristina (2016). Visual intimacy on social media: From selfies to the co-construction of intimacies through shared pictures. Social Media + Society, 2(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641705 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Milner, Ryan M. & Wolff, Paul (2023). On the meme train to Sylt: Memetic becoming and ambivalent identification online. Social Media + Society, 9(1), https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20563051231158825 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Miller, Daniel; Costa, Elisabetta; Haapio-Kirk, Laura; Haynes, Nell; Sinanan, Jolynna; McDonald, Tom; Nicolescu, Razvan; Spyer, Juliano; Venkatraman, Shriram & Wang, Xinyuan (2019 [2017]). Contemporary comparative anthropology—The why we post project. Ethnos, 84(2), 283-300.
Mirzoeff, Nicholas (2015). How to see the world. London: Penguin Books.
Mitchell, William J. (2005). What do pictures want?. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Mruck, Katja; Roth, Wolff-Michael & Breuer, Franz (Eds.) (2002). Subjectivity and reflexivity in qualitative research I. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/21 [Accessed: March 14, 2025].
Müller, Michael R. (2011). Das Körperbild als Selbstbild. In Michael R. Müller, Hans-Georg Soeffner & Anne Sonnenmoser (Eds.), Körper haben: die symbolische Formung der Person (pp.87-106). Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Polkinghorne, Donald E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Porritt, Kylie & Pearson, Alan (2013). The historical emergence of qualitative synthesis. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
Reckwitz, Andreas (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie der sozialen Praktiken. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 32(4), 282-301.
Reis, Shmuel; Hermoni, Doron; Van-Raalte, Riki; Dahan, Rachel & Borkan, Jeffrey M. (2007). Aggregation of qualitative studies—From theory to practice: patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations. Patient Education and Counseling, 65(2), 214-222.
Robards, Brady & Lincoln, Sian (2017). Uncovering longitudinal life narratives: Scrolling back on Facebook. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 715-730.
Rose, Gillian (2022 [2001]). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Roth, Wolff-Michael; Breuer, Franz & Mruck, Katja (Eds.) (2003). Subjectivity and reflexivity in qualitative research II. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/18 [Accessed: March 14, 2025].
Schatzki, Theodor (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schreiber, Maria (2017). Audiences, aesthetics and affordances. Analysing practices of visual communication on social media. Digital Culture & Society, 3(2), 143-164.
Schreiber, Maria (2020). Digitale Bildpraktiken: Handlungsdimensionen visueller vernetzter Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Schreiber, Maria (2023). #Strokesurvivor on Instagram: Conjunctive experiences of adapting to disability. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 39(74), 50-72, https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.132468 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Sondheim, Alan (Ed.) (1996). Being online: Net subjectivity. New York, NY: Lusitania Press.
Spradley, James (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Spry, Tammy (2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706-732.
Stone, Rosanne Allequere (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tiidenberg, Katrin (2015). Great faith in surfaces—A visual narrative analysis of seflies. In Airi Alina Allaste & Katrin Tiidenberg (Eds.), "In search of …": New methodological approaches to youth research (pp.233-256). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tiidenberg, Katrin (2018). Selfies, why we love (and hate) them. Bingley: Emerald.
Tiidenberg, Katrin (2025/Forthcoming). Visual social media. In Martin Hand, Barry Sandywell & Victoria Szabo (Eds.), The Bloomsbury encyclopedia of visual culture: Digitisations, transformations, and futures. London: Bloomsbury.
Tiidenberg, Katrin; Hendry, Natalie Ann & Abidin, Crystal (2021). Tumblr. Cambridge: Polity press.
Tiidenberg, Katrin; Markham, Annette N.; Pereira, Gabriel; Rehder, Mads; Dremljuga, Ramona; Sommer, Jannek K. & Dougherty, Meghan (2017). "I'm an addict" and other sensemaking devices: A discourse analysis of self-reflections on lived experience of social media. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society (#SMSociety17), Toronto, Canada, July 28-30, https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097307 [Accessed: February 23, 2025].
Wolfinger, Nicholas H. (2002). On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background expectancies. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 85-93.
Zhao, Sumin & Zappavigna, Michele (2018). Beyond the self: Intersubjectivity and the social semiotic interpretation of the selfie. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1735-1754.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Katrin Tiidenberg, Professor, Dr, Dr

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.