Editorial Note: Standards, Expectations, and Potentials of On-line Reviews. Using the Special Issue: FQS Reviews II to Provide Some Considerations and an Invitation to Share in Further Discussions

Authors

  • Günter Mey University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.4.769

Keywords:

online publishing, reviews, multidisciplinary, prosuming

Abstract

On the occasion of publishing the second Special Issue: FQS Reviews some aspects of reviews as scientific products and of reviewing as a scientific action are discussed: Relying on the experience of publishing reviews in FQS for more than two years, possible (new) standards of reviewing and possible expectations towards the review process from both the readers and the writers of reviews will be outlined and used to discuss some potentials of on-line reviews. As the rubric FQS Reviews (like FQS altogether) is addressing a multidisciplinary audience, contributions belonging to this rubric should inform the readers in a rather comprehensive way and they should be attractive for different readers. To attain this, reviews in FQS should fulfill at least three main functions: a description of the contents, an evaluation, and some contextualization, i.e., introduce the respective research field to which the book/media unit belongs. Additionally, on-line reviews require some special design and layout characteristics to support their usability and readability. So, for the last two years, we have engaged in developing, establishing and formalizing processes of FQS Review in order to improve the quality of on-line reviews provided. Using this report about the state of FQS Review—and, more generally, about on-line reviews and reviewing—we would like to invite the feedback and suggestions of all colleagues participating in and/or interested in FQS, which will be used to structure our further work. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0204415

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Günter Mey, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal

Günter MEY (http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/impressum/mey-d.htm) ist Book Review-Editor in FQS, neben dem Forschungsschwerpunkt "Online-Kommunikation/-Publishing" arbeitet er zu "Qualitative Methodologie und Methoden" und zu "narrativer Identität".

Published

2002-11-30

How to Cite

Mey, G. (2002). Editorial Note: Standards, Expectations, and Potentials of On-line Reviews. Using the Special Issue: FQS Reviews II to Provide Some Considerations and an Invitation to Share in Further Discussions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.4.769

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>