Ein epistemologischer Rahmen für die Integration von konfigurativen systematischen Reviews, Gadamers Hermeneutik und reflexiver thematischer Analyse

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.3.4351

Schlagworte:

systematische Reviews, konfigurative Reviews, Hermeneutik, reflexive thematische Analyse

Abstract

Systematische Reviews folgen einem strengen Protokoll zu Identifizierung, Auswahl, Bewertung und Synthese von Literatur. Dennoch übersehen Wissenschaftler*innen häufig die Notwendigkeit einer epistemologischen Begründung, wenn sie verschiedene Forschungsansätze kombinieren, was zu Unklarheiten hinsichtlich ihrer effektiven Integration führt. In diesem Artikel gehen wir auf dieses Problem ein, indem wir die gemeinsamen epistemologischen Grundlagen von konfigurativen Reviews, Hans-Georg GADAMERs Hermeneutik und der reflexiven thematischen Analyse aufzeigen – nämlich eine nicht-fundamentalistische Haltung, ontologischer Idealismus, induktives Denken, iterative Prozesse und eine qualitativ-interpretative Ausrichtung. Aufbauend auf diesen Gemeinsamkeiten schlagen wir einen epistemischen Rahmen vor, durch den die kohärente Integration der Verfahren, Prinzipien und Begründungen dieser Methoden unterstützt und damit eine strukturierte Grundlage für die Weiterentwicklung geboten wird.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Autor/innen-Biografien

Francisco Fonseca, Federal University of Pernambuco

Francisco FONSÊCA is an associate professor at the Business School of the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), where he has served as deputy coordinator of the Organizational Reality Observatory (ORO) research group since 2022. His research interests encompass decent work, precarious work, and social justice, with a particular emphasis on the nuanced representations of labor precarity and social injustice in the Agreste Region of Pernambuco, as well as within the virtual environments of video games. He is committed to advancing both theoretical understanding and practical application in these fields, seeking to have a constructive impact on organizational dynamics and local societal contexts. In his recent scholarship, he primarily employs qualitative methodologies, most notably hermeneutic approaches, and configurative systematic reviews. These methodological frameworks combine analytical rigor with interpretive depth in the study of contemporary labor phenomena.

Débora Dourado, Federal University of Pernambuco

Débora DOURADO is a full professor at the Business Science Department of the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE). From 2003 onwards, she has been a faculty researcher at the Organizational Reality Observatory (ORO) in Pernambuco, assuming the role of coordinator of this research group in 2009. In 2011, she served as a track chair in the Organizational Studies division of ANPAD. She regularly acts as a peer reviewer for several leading Brazilian academic journals, including Cadernos EBAPE, Organizações & Sociedade, and Gestão.Org. In 2015, she completed a postdoctoral fellowship at NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands, where she researched public policies related to urban mobility. She has been a faculty member in the Department of Administrative Sciences at UFPE since 1996 and currently holds the rank of full professor. In her research agenda, she focuses on the individual within organizations, power and control relations, decent work versus precarious labor, and the dynamics of platform cooperativism in contrast to platform capitalism. All of these research interests are grounded in a perspective that values the inseparability of teaching, research, and community engagement.

Literaturhinweise

Amjad, Ayesha; Kordel, Piotr & Fernandes, Gabriela (2023). The systematic review in the field of management sciences. Organization and Management Series, 170, 9-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.170.1 [Accessed: May 18, 2025].

Armstrong, Paul W.; Brown, Chris & Chapman, Christopher J. (2020). School-to-school collaboration in England: A configurative review of the empirical evidence. Review of Educational Research, 9(1), 319-351, https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3248 [Accessed: May 18, 2024].

Barrett, Frank J.; Powley, Edward H. & Pearce, Barnett (2011). Hermeneutic philosophy and organizational theory. In Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia (Eds.), Philosophy and organization theory (Vol. 32, pp.181-213). Bingley: Emerald.

Barrett, Lewis; Goldspink, Sally & Engward, Hilary (2022). Being in the wood: Using a presuppositional interview in hermeneutic phenomenological research. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 1062-1077, https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211061055 [Accessed: January 04, 2024].

Bartley, Kevin A. & Brooks, Jeffrey J. (2023). Fusion of horizons: Realizing a meaningful understanding in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 940-961.

Bauer, Martin W. & Aarts, Bas (2000). Corpus construction: A principle for qualitative data collection. In Martin W. Bauer & George Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research (pp.19-37). London: Sage.

Bhattacharya, Kakali & Kim, Jeong-Hee (2020). Reworking prejudice in qualitative inquiry with Gadamer and de/colonizing onto-epistemologies. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(10), 1174-1183.

Bleicher, Josef (1980). Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Boell, Sebastian K. & Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 257-286, https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412 [Accessed: September 12, 2023].

Bowen, Glenn (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2012). Thematic analysis. In Harris Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp.57-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352.

Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria & Hayfield, Nikki (2015). Thematic analysis. In Jonathan A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp.222-248). London: Sage.

Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria; Hayfield, Nikki & Terry, Gareth (2017). Thematic analysis. In Carla Willig & Wendy S. Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp.17-36). London: Sage.

Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria; Hayfield, Nikki & Terry, Gareth (2019). Thematic analysis. In Pranee Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp.843-860). Singapore: Springer.

Briscoe, Simon; Melendez-Torres, Gerardo J.; Shaw, Liz & Coon, Jo T. (2025). Framing systematic reviews commissioned by policymakers as a hermeneutic process: A methodological commentary. Methodological Innovations, 18(2), 114-126, https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991251329760 [Accessed: May 14, 2025].

Byrne, David (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality and Quantity, 56, 1391-1412, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y [Accessed: November 15, 2023].

Byrne, Michelle (2001). Hermeneutics as a methodology for textual analysis. AORN Journal, 73(5), 968-970, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61749-3 [Accessed: May 21, 2025].

Clarke, Virginia; Braun, Victoria & Terry, Gareth (2019). Thematic analysis. In Pranee Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health and social sciences (pp.843-860). Singapore: Springer.

Connolly, John M. & Keutner, Thomas (1988). Interpretation, decidability, and meaning. In John M. Connolly & Thomas Keutner (Eds.), Hermeneutics versus science? Three German views (pp.1-67). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Crotty, Michael (1998). Interpretivism: The way of hermeneutics. In Michael Crotty (Ed.), The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process (pp.86-102). London: Sage.

Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2018). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.1-26). London: Sage.

De Paoli, Stefano (2024). Further explorations on the use of large language models for thematic analysis. Open-ended prompts, better terminologies and thematic maps. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 25(3), Art. 5, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-25.2.4196 [Accessed: July 17, 2025].

Dolowitz, David; Buckler, Steve & Sweeney, Fionnghuala (2008). Researching online. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Eikeland, Ingunn & Ohna, Stein E. (2022). Differentiation in education: A configurative review. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 157-170, https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351 [Accessed: August 27, 2023].

Freeman, Melissa (2007). Performing the event of understanding in hermeneutic conversations with narrative texts. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(7), 925-944.

Freeman, Melissa (2011). Validity in dialogic encounters with hermeneutic truths. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 543-551.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1976). On the scope and function of hermeneutical reflection. In David E. Linge (Ed.), Hans-Georg Gadamer: Philosophical hermeneutics (pp.18-43). Berkley, MA: University of California Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1988). On the circle of understanding. In John M. Connolly & Thomas Keutner (Eds.), Hermeneutics versus science? Three German views (pp.68-78). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2004 [1960]). Truth and method. London: Continuum.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2005 [1977]). Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Gillo, Mariano D. (2021). Fundamentals of hermeneutics as a qualitative research theoretical framework. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(3), 42-45, https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.43 [Accessed: April 13, 2024].

Gobo, Giampietro (2023). Mixed methods and their pragmatic approach: Is there a risk of being entangled in a positivist epistemology and methodology? Limits, pitfalls and consequences of a bricolage methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4005 [Accessed: July 18, 2024].

Gough, David & Thomas, James (2017). Commonality and diversity in reviews. In David Gough, Sandy Oliver & James Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed., pp.43-70). London: Sage.

Gough, David; Thomas, James & Oliver, Sandy (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(28), 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28 [Accessed: February 07, 2021].

Greenhalgh, Trisha; Thorne, Sally & Malterud, Kirsti (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), e12931, https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931 [Accessed: May 8, 2025].

Grondin, Jean (2016). The hermeneutical circle. In Niall Keane & Chris Lawn (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics (pp.299-305). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

Habermas, Jürgen (1986). A review of Gadamer's truth and method. In Brice R. Wachterhauser (Ed.), Hermeneutics and modern philosophy (pp.243-276). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Harden, Angela & Thomas, James (2005). Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), 257-271.

Hekman, Susan (1984). Action as a text? Gadamer's hermeneutics and the social scientific analysis of action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 14(3), 333-354.

Jesson, Jill; Matheson, Lydia & Lacey, Fiona M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. London: Sage.

Kerr, Jeannie (2020). Unsettling Gadamerian hermeneutic inquiry: Engaging the colonial difference. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(5), 544-550.

Kitchenham, Barbara A. & Charters, Stuart (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University, UK.

Koch, Tina (1996). Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: Philosophy, rigor, and representation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 174-184.

Kutsyuruba, Benjamin (2023). Document analysis. In Joseph M. Okoko, Scott Tunison & Keith D. Walker (Eds.), Varieties of qualitative research methods (pp.139-146). Cham: Springer.

Levinsson, Magnus & Prøitz, Tine S. (2017). The (non-)use of configurative reviews in education. Education Inquiry, 8(3), 209-231, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1297004 [Accessed: May 16, 2021].

Lindén, Jitka & Čermák, Ivo (2007). Studying dialogical selves dialogically: Multiple-horizon analysis of critical moments in the working life of theatre actors in two cultures. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 45-62.

Malpas, Jeff (2015). Introduction: Hermeneutics and philosophy. In Jeff Malpas & Hans-Helmuth Gander (Eds.), The Routledge companion to hermeneutics (pp.1-10). London: Taylor & Francis.

Mason, William & May, Tim (2020). Hermeneutics. In Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug & Richard A. Williams (Eds.), Sage research methods foundations. London: Sage.

Morgan, Hani (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044 [Accessed: October 14, 2023].

Myers, Michael D. (2016). Hermeneutics in organization studies. In Razar Mir, Hugh Willmott & Michelle Greenwood (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies (pp.113-124). London: Routledge.

Oliver, Sandy & Tripney, Janice (2017). Systematic review and meta-analysis. In Dominic Wyse, Neil Selwyn, Emma Smith & Larry E. Suter (Eds.), The Bera/Sage handbook of educational research (pp.452-476). London: Sage

Palmer, Richard E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Paterson, Margo & Higgs, Joy (2005). Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 339-357, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1853 [Accessed: October 21, 2022].

Pati, Debajyoti & Lorusso, Lesa N. (2018). How to write a systematic review of the literature. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(1), 15-30.

Patterson, Michael E. & Williams, Daniel R. (2002). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Hermeneutic principles, methods, and case examples. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.

Regan, Paul (2012). Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics: Concepts of reading, understanding and interpretation. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, IV(2), 286-303.

Sauer, Philipp C. & Seuring, Stefan (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1899-1933, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3 [Accessed: March 17, 2021].

Shepherd, Dean A. & Sutliffe, Kathleen M. (2011). Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy Management Review, 36, 361-380.

Simms, Karl (2015). Hans-Georg Gadamer. London: Routledge.

Suri, Harsh & Clarke, David (2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395-430.

Tatievskaya, Elena (2012). The notion of tradition in Gadamer's hermeneutic ontology. Philosophical News, 5(2), 232-241.

Terry, Gareth; Hayfield, Nikki; Clarke, Victoria & Braun, Virginia (2017). Thematic analysis. In Carla Willig & Wendy Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp.17-37). London: Sage.

Tight, Malcolm (2019). Documentary research in the social sciences. London: Sage.

Tomkins, Leah & Eatough, Virginia (2018). Hermeneutics: Interpretation, understanding and sense-making. In Catherine Cassell, Ann L. Cunliffe & Gina Grandy (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods (pp.185-200). London: Sage.

Vaismoradi, Mojtaba & Snelgrove, Sherrill (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), Art. 23,http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376 [Accessed: July 18, 2025].

VanLeeuwen, Charlene A., Guo-Brennan, Linyuan & Weeks, Lori E. (2017). Conducting hermeneutic research in international settings: Philosophical, practical, and ethical considerations. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, Art. 7, https://doi.org/10.11575/jah.v0i0.53309 [Accessed: May 01, 2025].

Vlăduţescu, Ştefan (2018). Six steps of hermeneutical process at H.-G. Gadamer. Postmodern Openings, 9(2), 161-174, https://doi.org/10.18662/po/26 [Accessed: December 13, 2023].

Wanyama, Seperia B.; McQuaid, Ronald W. & Kittler, Markus (2021). Where you search determines what you find: The effects of bibliographic databases on systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(3), 409-422.

Webber, Katie M.; Dhaliwal, Sandip K. & Wong, Katherine. (2023). Conducting literature reviews hermeneutically. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, Art. 5, https://doi.org/10.11575/jah.v2023i2023.77813 [Accessed: May 17, 2025].

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2025-09-28

Zitationsvorschlag

Fonseca, F., & Dourado, D. (2025). Ein epistemologischer Rahmen für die Integration von konfigurativen systematischen Reviews, Gadamers Hermeneutik und reflexiver thematischer Analyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.3.4351

Ausgabe

Bd. 26 Nr. 3 (2025)

Rubrik

Einzelbeiträge

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco Fonseca, Débora Coutinho PASCHOAL DOURADO

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.