Nested Sampling in Sequential Mixed Methods Research Designs: Comparing Recipe and Result

Authors

  • Pascal Tanner Centre hospitalier universitaire Vaudois

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4004

Keywords:

mixed methods, sequential research design, nested sampling, sociology of religion, social milieus, causal analysis

Abstract

In this contribution, I focus on nested sampling as it is applied in sequential quantitative-qualitative mixed methods research. The function of this design element is to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. I refer to a specific type of recommendation that has proved particularly useful for the analysis of social milieus. An important feature of this approach is that the quantitative sample is divided into subgroups in order to then collect more qualitative data than would otherwise be the case. I present two projects in which nested sampling was implemented in this respect, but each in a different way. Subsequently, recipe and result will be compared. This reveals a number of discrepancies that are of interest both from a methodological point of view and in terms of research application. Above all, it will become clear that nested sampling is not only applicable to the analysis of social milieus. The same approach can also be applied to the analysis of complex causal relationships. But it may be difficult to provide all subgroups with sufficient qualitative cases. As I will show, nested sampling can be employed and implemented in such studies as well. However, the effort involved should not be underestimated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pascal Tanner, Centre hospitalier universitaire Vaudois

Pascal TANNER is an associate researcher at the Centre hospitalier universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) in Lausanne, Switzerland. He received his PhD as a sociologist with a MMR study on organized secularism in Switzerland. His research interests are religious change, non-religion and the relationship between religion, spirituality and health care.

References

Beaman, Lori G. (2017). Deep equality in an era of religious diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beaman, Lori G. & Tomlins, Steven (Eds.) (2015). Atheist identities—spaces and social contexts (Vol. 2). Cham: Springer.

Brewer, John & Hunter, Albert (2006). Foundations of multimethod research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cimino, Richard & Smith, Christopher (2014). Atheist awakening: Secular activism and community in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cornelio, Jayeel Serrano; Gauthier, François; Martikainen, Tuomas & Woodhead, Linda (Eds.) (2022). Routledge international handbook of religion in global society. London: Routledge.

Götzenbrucker, Gerit; Griesbeck, Michaela & Preibisch, Kai (2022). Qualitative interview research with vulnerable groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 23(3), Art. 5, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-23.3.3934 [Accessed: January 6, 2023].

Guest, Greg (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 141-151.

Kelle, Udo (2001). Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 5, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.966 [Accessed: January 6, 2023].

Kelle, Udo & Kluge, Susann (2010). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Kelle, Udo; Langfeldt, Bettina & Metje, Brigitte (2019). "Nun sag, wie hast du’s mit der Religion?" – eine Mixed-Methods-Untersuchung verschiedener Items zu religiösen Überzeugungen im ALLBUS 2012. In Pascal Siegers, Sonja Schulz & Oshrat Hochman (Eds.), Einstellungen und Verhalten der deutschen Bevölkerung: Analysen mit dem ALLBUS (pp.93-122). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Keysar, Ariela (2017). Religious/nonreligious demography and religion versus science: A global perspective. In Phil Zuckerman & John R. Shook (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of secularism (pp.40-53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levin, Jeff & Idler, Ellen (2021). Religion, aging, and public health. The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health, online only.

Mason, Mark (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Art. 8, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428 [Accessed: January 6, 2023].

Morse, Janice (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120-123.

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. & Collins, Kathleen M.T. (2017). The role of sampling in mixed methods-research: Enhancing inference quality. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 133-156.

Parlapani, Eleni; Holeva, Vasiliki; Nikopoulou, Vasiliki A.; Kaprinis, Stergios; Nouskas, Ioannis & Diakogiannis, Ioannis (2021). A review on the COVID-19-related psychological impact on older adults: Vulnerable or not?. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(6), 1729-1743.

Pickel, Gert & Sammet, Kornelia (2014). Einführung in die Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Religionsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Pollack, Detlef & Rosta, Gergely (2017). Religion and modernity: An international comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Radford, Alec; Kim, Jong Wook; Xu, Tao; Brockman, Greg; McLeavey, Christine & Sutskever, Ilya (2022). Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision, https://cdn.openai.com/papers/whisper.pdf [Accessed: November 28, 2022].

Schröder, Stefan (2018). Freigeistige Organisationen in Deutschland: Weltanschauliche Entwicklungen und strategische Spannungen nach der humanistischen Wende. Boston, MA: de Gruyter.

Stolz, Jörg (2017). Milieus and mixed methods: Describing and explaining religion and secularity in Switzerland. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 361-386.

Stolz, Jörg; Könemann, Judith; Schneuwly Purdie, Mallory; Englberger, Thomas & Krüggeler, Michael (2018). (Un)believing in modern society: Religion, spirituality, and religious-secular competition. London: Routledge.

Stolz, Jörg; Bünker, Arnd; Liedhegener, Antonius; Baumann-Neuhaus, Eva; Becci, Irene; Dandarova, Zhargalma R.; Senn, Jeremy; Tanner, Pascal; Wäckerlig, Oliver & Winter-Pfändler, Urs (Eds.) (2022). Religionstrends in der Schweiz. Religion, Spiritualität und Säkularität im gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Szende, Agota; Janssen, Bas & Cabases, Juan (Eds.) (2014). Self-reported population health: An international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Tanner, Pascal (2022). Religionslose Personen in der Schweiz. Soziologisches Porträt einer wachsenden Bevölkerungsgruppe. In Jörg Stolz, Arnd Bünker, Antonius Liedhegener, Eva Baumann-Neuhaus, Irene Becci, Zhargalma R. Dandarova, Jeremy Senn, Pascal Tanner, Oliver Wäckerlig & Urs Winter-Pfändler (Eds.), Religionstrends in der Schweiz. Religion, Spiritualität und Säkularität im gesellschaftlichen Wandel (pp.65-82). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Thiessen, Joel & Wilkins-Laflamme, Sarah (2017). Becoming a religious none: Irreligious socialization and disaffiliation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(1), 64-82.

Thiessen, Joel & Wilkins-Laflamme, Sarah (2020). None of the above: Nonreligious identity in the US and Canada. New York, NY: NYU Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Tanner, P. (2023). Nested Sampling in Sequential Mixed Methods Research Designs: Comparing Recipe and Result. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4004

Issue

Section

Combining Multiple Sampling Techniques, Data Sources and Methods of Analysis