Co-Creating Research Design: How to Achieve Participation in Social Studies Using Traditional Methods?

Authors

  • Ivanna Kyliushyk Kozminski University
  • Dominika Winogrodzka Kozminski University
  • Emil Chról Kozminski University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.3.4381

Keywords:

qualitative methods, participatory methods, data triangulation, knowledge co-production, Ukrainian forced migration, focus group interviews, individual in-depth interviews

Abstract

While traditional methods such as focus group interviews (FGIs) and individual in-depth interviews (IDIs) are well-established in social research, their innovative use within participatory research remains underexplored. In this article, we address this gap by introducing a co-creation research design to combine qualitative data triangulation with a participatory approach. The study involved semi-structured IDIs with middle-class Ukrainian female forced migrants, preceded and followed by FGIs with Ukrainian women experts—practitioners with both professional and personal migration experience. The initial FGI supported the participatory development of the research topic and interview guide, ensuring relevance and ethical sensitivity. The final FGI allowed the same group of experts to interpret the IDIs' findings collaboratively and discuss their practical application. This co-creative process enabled mutual learning between researchers and community actors and increased the ethical accountability and analytical depth of the study. We discuss both the potential and limitations of this approach and argue that traditional qualitative methods, when combined with participatory elements, can significantly enhance co-production of knowledge and the impact of social research. We contribute to research methodology development and encourage further adaptation of participatory strategies in qualitative inquiry by offering practical insights into the design and implementation of this method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ivanna Kyliushyk, Kozminski University

Ivanna KYLIUSHYK, PHD, is a political scientist and sociologist. In her work, she focuses on migration studies, particularly Ukrainian migration, with a special emphasis on Ukrainian women's mobility. She also has a strong interest in qualitative research methods. Currently, Ivanna is an assistant professor (postdoc) at the Center for Research on Social Change and Human Mobility (CRASH) at Kozminski University, where she is involved in several international and national scientific projects, including "Link4Skill," Horizon Europe 2023, no. 101132476 and the BigMig project, National Science Centre of Poland, OPUS 19, no. 2020/37/B/HS6/02342. She also contributed to the "MIMY: Empowerment Through Liquid Integration of Migrant Youth in Vulnerable Conditions” project, Horizon Europe 2020, no. 870700.

Dominika Winogrodzka, Kozminski University

Dominika WINOGRODZKA, PhD, is a sociologist and social researcher who focuses on youth studies, career studies, and mobility studies. She has published in leading academic journals, including the Journal of Youth Studies, the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, and the International Journal of Social Research Methodology. She is a laureate of numerous scholarships from the National Science Centre, Poland (including SONATA BIS, PRELUDIUM, and OPUS). Her recent research projects include “MIMY: Empowerment Through Liquid Integration of Migrant Youth in Vulnerable Conditions," Horizon 2020, no. 870700, and "INSIMO: Work (In)stability and Spatial (Im)mobility from the Perspective of Young People on the Move. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic," National Science Centre, Poland, PRELUDIUM no. 2021/41/N/HS6/03681. Dominika is currently an assistant professor at the Institute of Sociology of the Jagiellonian University in Cracow.

Emil Chról, Kozminski University

Emil CHRÓL, PhD candidate, is a social researcher working at the intersection of sociology, anthropology, and political science. He is currently pursuing his doctoral degree at the Interdisciplinary Doctoral School of the University of Warsaw, where in his research he focuses on the changes of Ukrainian national identity in the context of war, migration, and cultural change. His academic interests include international relations, mobility, diaspora, identities, and the sociology of conflict. He has contributed as a qualitative researcher to several national and international scientific projects, e.g., "Link4Skill," Horizon Europe, no. 101132476. His most recent project is entitled: "TheseusUA: a study of changes in identity discourses and practices among Ukrainians as a reaction to Russian aggression," National Science Centre of Poland, PRELUDIUM 23, no. 2024/53/N/HS5/00353.

References

Aziz, Ayesha; Shams, Meenaz & Khan, Kausar S. (2011). Participatory action research as the approach for women's empowerment. Action Research, 9(3), 303-323.

Bakunzi, William (2018). Working with peer researchers in refugee communities. Forced Migration Review, 59, 58-59, https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/refugee_community_researchers_2018.pdf [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Bergold, Jarg & Thomas, Stefan (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 30, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Blachnicka-Ciacek, Dominika; Winogrodzka, Dominika & Trąbka, Agnieszka (2024). Enhancing benefits for peer researchers: Towards a flexible and needs-based approach to participatory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2024.2417380 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Bourdieu, Pierre (1991 [1982]). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brown, Nicole (2021). Scope and continuum of participatory research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(2), 200-211.

Calabria, Verusca & Bailey, Di (2021). Participatory action research and oral history as natural allies in mental health research. Qualitative Research, 23(3), 668-685.

Call-Cummings, Meagan & Ross, Karen (2022). Spectrums of participation: A framework of possibility for participatory inquiry and inquirers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 23(3), Art. 4, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-23.3.3825 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Chról, Emil & Kyliushyk, Ivanna (2025). Where do you see yourself in five years? Post-migration mobility of Ukrainian war migrants. In Izabela Grabowska, Ivanna Kyliushyk & Emil Chról (Eds.), Ukrainian female war migrants mobilising resources for prospective social remittances (pp.152-188). London: Routledge.

Clark-Kazak, Christina (2021). Ethics in forced migration research: Taking stock and potential ways forward. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 9(3), 125-138.

Cordeiro, Lucina; Soares, Cassia B. & Rittenmeyer, Leslie (2017). Unscrambling method and methodology in action research traditions: Theoretical conceptualization of praxis and emancipation. Qualitative Research, 17(4), 395-407.

Crabtree, Benjamin F.; Yanoshik, Kim M.; Miller, William L. & O'Connor, Patric J. (1993). Selecting individual or group interviews. In David L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp.137-149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, John W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cubero, Aloe; Mildenberger, Lucía & Garrido, Rocío (2024). Photovoice for promoting empowerment with migrant and refugee communities: A scoping review. Action Research, 0(0).

David, Matthew (2002). Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(1), 11-17.

Dick, Karen & Frazier, Susan C. (2006). An exploration of nurse practitioner care to homebound frail elders. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioner, 18(7), 325-334.

Duea, Stephanie R.; Zimmerman, Emily B.; Vaughn, Lisa M.; Dias, Sonia & Harris, Janet (2022). A guide to selecting participatory research methods based on project and partnership goals. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.32605 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Duggleby, Wendy (2005). What about focus group interaction data?. Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 832-840.

Duncan, Marie T. & Morgan, David L. (1994). Sharing the caring: Family caregivers' views of their relationships with nursing home staff. The Gerontologist, 34(2), 235-244.

Duszczyk, Maciej; Górny, Agata; Kaczmarczyk, Paweł & Kubisiak, Andrzej (2023). War refugees from Ukraine in Poland—One year after the Russian aggression. socioeconomic consequences and challenges. regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(1), 181-200.

Enria, Luisa (2016). Co-producing knowledge through participatory theatre: Reflections on ethnography, empathy and power. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 319-329.

Fedyuk, Olena; Homel, Kseniya; Jóźwiak, Ignacy; Kindler, Marta; Kowalska, Kamila; Kyliushyk, Ivanna; Lashchuk, Iuliia; Matuszczyk, Kamil & Tygielski, Maciej (2024). From temporariness to stability: A holistic approach to the employment of women covered by the special law in Poland / Od tymczasowości do stabilności: Holistyczne podejście do zatrudnienia kobiet objętych specustawą w Polsce. EUI, RSC, Policy Brief 2024/17, Migration Policy Centre, https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77175 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Gawlik, Katarzyna (2012). Badania fokusowe [Focus group research]. In Dariusz Jemielniak (Ed.), Badania jakościowe. Metody i narzędzia 2 [Qualitative research: methods and tools] (pp.132-135). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Gilodi, Amalia; Ryan, Louise & Aydar, Zeynep (2025). Peer research in a multi-national project with migrant youth: Re-thinking vulnerability and participatory approaches. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(2), Art. 16, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.2.4276 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Goeke, Stephanie & Kubanski, Dagmar (2012). People with disabilities as border crossers in the academic sector—chances for participatory research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 6, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1782 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Golczyńska-Grondas, Agnieszka & Waniek, Katarzyna (2022). Superwizja w jakościowych badaniach społecznych. O radzeniu sobie z trudnymi emocjami badających i badanych [Supervision in qualitative social research: Coping with the difficult emotions of researchers and participants. Qualitative Sociology Review, 18(4), 6-33, https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.18.4.01 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Górny, Agata & Kaczmarczyk, Paweł (2023). Between Ukraine and Poland. Ukrainian migrants in Poland during the war. CMR Spotlight, 2(48), https://www.migracje.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Spotlight-FEBRUARY-2023.pdf [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Guillemin, Marilys, & Gillam, Lynn (2004). Ethics, responsibility and "ethically important moments" in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280.

Hacker, Karen (2013). Community-based participatory research. London: Sage.

Hyden, Lars C. & Bulow, Pia H. (2003). Who's talking: Drawing conclusions from focus groups-some methodological considerations. Social Research Methodology, 6(4), 305-321.

Kairuz, Therese; Crump, Keith & O'Brien, Anthony J. (2007). Tools for data collection and analysis. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 278, 371-377.

Kilpatrick, Rosemary; McCartan, Claire; McAlister, Siobhan & McKeown, Penny (2007). "If I am brutally honest, research has never appealed to me …". The problems and successes of a peer research project. Educational Action Research, 15(3), 351-369.

Kindon, Sara; Pain, Rachel & Kesby, Mike (2007). Participatory action research: Origins, approaches and methods. In Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain & Mike Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp.9-18). London: Routledge.

Kint, Octavia; Duppen, Daan; Vandermeersche, Geert; Smetcoren, An S. & De Donder, Liesbeth (2024). How "co" can you go? A qualitative inquiry on the key principles of co-creative research and their enactment in real-life practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 28(1), 87-103.

Kuckartz, Udo & Rädiker, Stefan (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Cham: Springer.

Kyliushyk, Ivanna & Chról, Emil (2025). Ukrainian female migration in a historical perspective. In Izabela Grabowska, Ivanna Kyliushyk & Emil Chról (Eds.). Ukrainian female war migrants mobilising resources for prospective social remittances (pp.7-31). London: Routledge.

Kyliushyk, Ivanna; Winogrodzka, Dominika & Chról, Emil (2025). The twists and turns of mobility capital formation. A multi-level analysis of factors impacting capital building among Ukrainian forced migrants in Poland. Mobilities, 1-18.

Lambert, Sylvie D. & Loiselle, Carmen G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2), 228-237.

Lushey, Clare J. & Munro, Emily R. (2015). Participatory peer research methodology: An effective method for obtaining young people's perspectives on transitions from care to adulthood?. Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 522-537.

Maison, Dominika (2022). Jakościowe metody badań społecznych. Podejście aplikacyjne [Qualitative methods in social research: An applied approach]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Malone, Aaron (2020). Migrant communities and participatory research partnerships in the neoliberal university. Migration Letters, 17(2), 239-247, https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v17i2.805 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Mata-Codesal, Diana; Kloetzer, Laure & Maiztegui-Oñate, Concepcion (2020). Editorial: Strengths, risks and limits of doing participatory research in migration studies. Migration Letters, 17(2), 201-210, https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/934 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

McIntyre, Alice (2008). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Millar, Gearoid; Volonterio, Matias; Cabral, Lidia; Peša, Iva & Levick-Parkin, Melanie (2024). Participatory action research in neoliberal academia: An uphill struggle. Qualitative Research, 25(2), 478-498, https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241259979 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Moralli, Melissa (2024). Arts-based methods in migration research. A methodological analysis on participatory visual methods and their transformative potentials and limits in studying human mobility. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241254008 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Morgan, David L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.

Nassar-McMillan, Sylvia C. & Borders, Dianne L. (2002). Use of focus groups in survey item development. The Qualitative Report, 7(1), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2002.1987 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Nienaber, Birte & Kriszan, Agnes (2023). Thinking with the hands: LEGO® Serious Play® a game-based tool to empower young migrants integrating. Migration Letters, 20(3), 443-452, https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/2902 [Accessed: June 25, 2025].

Nienaber, Birte; Oliveira, Jose & Albert, Isabelle (Eds.) (2023). Doing action research with young migrants in vulnerable conditions. MIS-Working Paper, Université du Luxembourg, https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/60361/1/MIS_Working-paper_Doing-action-research-with-young-migrants-in-vulnerable-conditions_clean-version73.pdf [Accessed: February 10, 2025].

Nikielska-Sekula, Karolina & Desille, Amandine (Eds.) (2021). Visual methodology in migration studies new possibilities, theoretical implications, and ethical questions: New possibilities, theoretical implications, and ethical questions. Cham: Springer.

Nind, Melanie (2017). The practical wisdom of inclusive research. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 278-288.

Pietrusińska, Marta J.; Winogrodzka, Dominika & Trąbka, Agnieszka (2023). Researching young migrants in vulnerable conditions. Methodological and ethical guidelines based on the MIMY project. Deliverable No. 8.3. Methodological guidelines and manuals for replications in migration studies. SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, https://mimy-project.eu/outcomes/public-deliverables/MIMY_870700_D8-3_Methodological-guidelines-and-manuals-for-replications-in-migration%20studies_final.pdf [Accessed: February 10, 2025].

Pincock, Kate & Bakunzi, William (2021). Power, participation, and "peer researchers": Addressing gaps in refugee research ethics guidance. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), 2333-2348.

Plack, Margaret M. (2006). The development of communication skills, interpersonal skills, and a professional identity within a community of practice. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 20(1), 37-46.

Pustulka, Paula; Bell, Justyna & Trąbka, Agnieszka (2019). Questionable insiders: Changing positionalities of interviewers throughout stages of migration research. Field Methods, 31(3), 241-259.

Tokola, Nina; Rättilä, Tina; Honkatukia, Pavi; Mubeen, Fath & Sillanpää, Olli (2023). Participatory research among youth—too little, too much, too romanticised?. In Päivi Honkatukia & Tiina Rättilä (Eds.), Young people as agents of sustainable society: reclaiming the future (pp.161–176). London: Routledge.

Vaughn, Lisa M. & Jacquez, Farrah (2020). Participatory research methods—Choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244 [Accessed: February 10, 2025].

Von Unger, Hella (2021). Ethical reflexivity as research practice. Historical Social Research, 46(2), 186-204, https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.2.186-204 [Accessed: February 10, 2025].

Winogrodzka, Dominika; Kyliushyk, Ivanna & Chról Emil (2025). Mobility capital formation among forced migrants—Based on the example of Ukrainian women living in Poland due to the escalation of the Russian invasion. Migration Studies, 13(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaf019 [Accessed: February 10, 2025].

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

How to Cite

Kyliushyk, I., Winogrodzka, D., & Chról, E. (2025). Co-Creating Research Design: How to Achieve Participation in Social Studies Using Traditional Methods?. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.3.4381

Issue

Section

Single Contributions